Wafa Sultan er født i Syria og utdannet psykiater, men er i dag amerikansk statsborger. Hun er kjent som en av USAs mest hardtslående islamkritikere. Sultan mener at problemet med islam er dypt forankret i den islamske læren. Islam er ikke bare en religion. Islam er også en politisk ideologi som preker vold, mener hun. Selv begynte hun å tvile på islam etter å ha vært øyenvitne til at hennes professor ved universitetet i Aleppo i Syria ble meiet ned av terrorister med maskingeværer, mens hun var medisinstudent. ”De skjøt hundrevis av kuler inn i ham, mens de ropte ”Gud er stor”, har hun fortalt.
Her blir hun intervjuet i et arabisk TV-program:
Her er en av hennes taler, holdt i LA i oktober 2009:
Det er et tankekors at våre myndigheter har importert imamer og betalt for bygging av moskeer uten å ha gått i dybden på hva slags filosofi islam faktisk er.
I completely agree with you there, this is how «good» Muslims treat Christians in that bastion of ‘moderate’ Islam – INDONESIA
Indonesia is the world’s largest Muslim nation and it’s easy to see why. Systematic torture and brutal executions of innocent Christians and their children are beyond belief. Yet we never hear a word about it from the Western media.
If you’ve seen the other Graphic videos, this is one of the most disturbing. The victims aren’t soldiers, they are civilians and children whose only crime is being Christian. CLICK HERE TO SEE VIDEO (WARNING: Truly Horrific Images): http://www.truthtube.tv/play.php?vid=1499
Det «tankekorset» har jeg fundert over i mange aar. Og tror det for en stor del skyldes vaare myndigheters totale mangel paa kunnskap om og interesse for religion! De aller fleste norske politikere er totalt «religions-relativister», og fatter og begriper ikke hverken AT eller hvordan en religion kan bety saa mye og vaere saa totalt-bestemmende i folks liv.
Dermed oppfatter de folks «krav» om f.eks. bygging av moskeer eller importering av imamer, som en «rettighet» som foelger av vaar «religionsfrihet»…
Og kritiske kommentarer som «hat mot folkegruppe»!
Undres om norske eller europeiske ledere noen gang har lyttet til denne kvinnen.
I wonder whether Norwegian politicians have ever read the Quran and Hadith? It is a very hateful ideology and there is NO love towards a non Muslim in the Quran.
Jeg tror et forsvinnende lite mindretall av baade norske og europeiske politikere noen gang har lest Koranen eller hadithene. Og jeg tror heller ikke de har lest BIBELEN! Dvs. at europeiske politikere flest ikke har kunnskap om verken vaar europeiske religioese «arv» ELLER den ideologien som dikterer livene til en stadig stoerre andel mennesker bosatt i Europa! Dette er en grov «unnlatelses-synd» som kan faa uante negative foelger for vaart kontinent!
Hvis en fremmed MILITAER invasjonsstyrke angriper et land, vil det angrepne landets militaere OG politikere gjoere ALT de kan for aa faa kunnskap om angripernes vaapen og militaere kapasitet. Men kunnskap om angripernes IDEOLOGISKE vaapen og kapasitet, er minst like viktig!
I Europa i dag er det viktig for FOERST aa faa vaare politikere klar over at det er fare paa ferde, for deretter for aa mobilisere til motstand!
All political parties that take the Muslim immigration seriously should appoint a group to study the Koran. And it is important to point out that you can not understand the Quran without reading the Hadith. In this way we can easily prove that this is not a «religion of peace»
Here’s what the Islamic scholars had to say about Al-Bukhari’s Hadith : “Al-Bukhari’s Hadith is the most authentic and true book of the Prophet.” The translators said, “I am perfectly sure that the translation, with Allah’s help and after all the great efforts exerted in its production, has neared perfection.” The imams from the cradle of Islam, the Islamic University of Medina in Saudi Arabia, said, “It has been unanimously agreed that Imam Bukhari’s work is the most authentic of all the other sources in Hadith literature put together. It is second only to the Qur’an.” And Remember that a «good» Muslim follows Muhammad’s words Bukhari:V4B53N412 «Allah’s Apostle said on the day of the conquest of Mecca, ‘There is no migration now, only Jihad, holy battle. And when you are called for Jihad, you should come out at once.’»
A doctrine that orders and inspires people to commit mass murder is criminal. Islam must be exposed and made illegal just as we did the KKK. The Qur’an and Hadith are a declaration of war against all non-Muslims. Thus we must repudiate and neutralize this enemy before they kill more of us. But the way to exterminate the terrorist dogma of Islam is by exposing it, condemning it, outlawing it, and most importantly, starving it of cash.
Islam is a lie. Truth is lethal to all lies. Let me give you an example of accurate disclosure wielded appropriately. In the early 1920′s one out of every ten adult men in America were members of the KKK. Some courageous journalists gained access to the Klan’s charter documents and published them in a scathing attack. People were so repulsed by what they read, it became impossible for the Klan to recruit and maintain devotees. Membership fell 95% in less than two years. And while that was a triumph, there is a costly reminder of what happens when we don’t expose and condemn deceptive, destructive and deadly religious and political doctrines. Adolf Hitler wrote Mein Kampf in 1924. In it he told the world what he was going to do. But we ignored, excused, and misrepresented his new politicized religion until it was too late. Fifty-five million people died as a result. Tolerating evils like Islam, a politicized religion nearly identical to Nazism, is merciless. Advancing its cause, like America’s president Barack Hussein Obama is doing, is treasonous. That said, the five earliest and most universally acclaimed Islamic sources (the Qur’an, Ishaq’s Sira or Biography of Muhammad, Tabari’s Ta’rikh or History of Islam’s Formation, and Bukhari’s and Muslim’s Topical Hadith Collections) is a loaded «gun»(with WORDS J.Simonsen). Read and use Muhammad words against them.(in a debate)
islam er en freds religion!!! det som andre terrorister gjør har ikke noe med islam å gjøre!! uansett hva muslimer gjør så er det det som står i koranen som er det riktige islam!!! islam forbir terror!!
Having studied Islam’s earliest and most important books—the Qur’an, Sira, Ta’rikh, and Hadith—I didn’t find a «Prophet of Mercy.» I found a pedophile, rapist, pirate, slave trader, mass murderer, and terrorist. So you either think these perverse behaviors are «merciful» or you are manufacturing your own prophet.
«Uansett hva muslimer gjor, er det det som staar i Koranen som er det riktige islam».
HELT riktig! Men problemet er jo at Koranen baade tillater, oppfordrer til og BEFALER terrorisme!!! Undertrykking av kvinner og ikke-muslimer, for ikke aa snakke om DRAP paa «apostater» og ikke-muslimer som ikke uten videre finner seg i muslimenes overherredoemme!
Dessuten er «profetens» eksempel, gjengitt i hadithene, en del av «det riktige islam». Ikke mange muslimer -- aktive Al Quaida-terrorister inkludert -- som overgaar DET «eksempelet» i reinspikka DJEVELSKAP!
Islam er sannelig ikke noen «freds»-religion, det er en ONDSKAPS-religion! Eller som fler og fler blir klar over; Islam er SATANS EGEN RELIGION!
,,…islam forbir terror,,
En skrivefeil for ,,….islam forblir terror..,, det eneste korrekte etter min mening.
@vidar
hvor har du det i fra?? kan du bevisse det? har du lest koranen?? du sier at islam befaler terrorisme? NEI! islam gjør ikke det!! jeg har selv lest koranen flere ganger!!! så kan de som sier at islam er en djevelsk religion, bare dra selv til helvete med satan!!!
Da er du analfabet.
http://www.truthtube.tv/play.php?vid=3189
Sannheten snakker for seg selv
Why is it that Muslims must contradict Allah and Muhammad to make Islam seem good?
Ishaq:327 “Allah said, ‘A prophet must slaughter before collecting captives. A slaughtered enemy is driven from the land. Muhammad, you craved the desires of this world, its goods and the ransom captives would bring. But Allah desires killing them to manifest the religion.’”
Islamic terrorists have correctly interpreted Muhammad’s message. Bukhari:V5B59N512 “The Prophet had their men killed, their children and woman taken captive.” This is confirmed by Allah: Qur’an 33:26 “Allah made the Jews leave their homes by terrorizing them so that you killed some and made many captive. And He made you inherit their lands, their homes, and their wealth. He gave you a country you had not traversed before.”
Bukhari:V4B52N220 «Allah’s Apostle said, ‘I have been made victorious with terror.’»
Based on the evidence as it is presented in the five earliest Islamic sources, one has to be ignorant of the facts, irrational, or immoral to be a Muslim. These conditions have led to your errant, ignorant, irrational, and immoral opinion regarding Islamic terrorism. Deluded by a deceitful, foolish, and demonic religion, you have become like Islam.
The Koran says hundreds of times that Muslims are to follow Allah’s and His Messenger’s orders, and to follow Muhammad’s example. And Muhammad was a sexual pervert, a pedophile, a rapist, a polygamist, and an adulterer engaged in incest. He was a ruthless thug, an assassin, a mass murderer, slave trader, thief, con man, warmonger, and terrorist. He was the criminal. He was the aggressor. He was rotten to the core. If the Qur’an is the word of Allah, then the only place to find Muhammad’s orders is in the Hadith. Further, the only place Muhammad’s example is presented is in the Hadith. So, without the Hadith, the Koran’s repeated instructions are impossible to follow, making either the Koran ridiculous or the Hadith required. The Quran is senseless without the Hadith. It is a jumbled, out of order, and out of context rant. It’s a poor job of plagiarizing and little more.
And if you wonder how a «good» Muslim can be a terrorist? Read this: Muhammad called «bad Muslims» hypocrites or apostates. From the definition of Jihad provided to us by al-Bukhari, we learn: «Jihad is an obligatory duty in Islam on every Muslim. He who tries to escape this duty, or does not fervently fulfill this obligation, dies as a hypocrite.»
The next Hadith (Ishaq:394) clearly shows that the difference between «bad» (peace loving) Muslims and «good» (loyal) Muslims: «Allah said, ‘I let them get the better of you to test you. So fear Me and obey Me. If you had believed in what My Prophet brought from Me you would not have received a shock from the Meccan army. But We cause days like this so that Allah may know those who believe and may choose martyrs from among you. Allah must distinguish between believers and hypocrites so that He can honor the faithful with martyrdom…. Did you think that you would enter Paradise and receive My reward before I tested you so that I might know who is loyal? You used to wish for martyrdom before you met the enemy. You wished for death before you met it. Now that you have seen with your own eyes the death of swords…will you go back on your religion, Allah’s Book, and His Prophet as disbelievers, abandoning the fight with your enemy?’»
Speaking of peaceful Muslims, the Qur’an says, 4.77 «Have you not seen those to whom it was said: Withhold your hands from fighting, perform the prayer and pay the zakat (religious tax). But when orders for fighting were issued, a party of them feared men as they ought to have feared Allah. They say: ‘Our Lord, why have You ordained fighting for us, why have You made war compulsory?’» The Qur’an ordains Muslims to fight, whether they like it or not. War is compulsory. And the enemy is all non-Muslims. Islam is unambiguous: good Muslims kill.
Good Muslims are loyal to the order to fight and kill all non-Muslims: Muslim:C9B1N33 «The Prophet said: ‘I have been commanded to fight against people till they testify that there is no god but Allah, that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, and they establish prostration prayer, and pay Zakat. If they do it, their blood and property are protected.’»
Islam’s penalty for being a peace-loving Muslim is: Qur’an 33.6 «Truly, if the Hypocrites, those in whose hearts is a disease, those who stir up sedition, the agitators in the City, do not desist, We shall urge you (O Muhammad) to go against them and set you over them. Then they will not be able to stay as your neighbor for any length of time. They shall have a curse on them. Whenever they are found, they shall be seized and slain without mercy -- a fierce slaughter -- murdered, a horrible murdering. (Such was) the practice (approved) of Allah among those who lived before. No change wilt thou find in the practice of Allah.» Muhammad also orders: Bukhari V4B52N260 «If a Muslim discards his Islamic religion, kill him.»
@Younes.
Det som er feil med Islam er at den ikke passer inn i Norge eller den vestlige verden. Livssyn, menneskeverd osv. er som natt og dag i forhold til mitt og andre vestliges meninger om hva som er rett og galt. Jeg er etnisk Norsk, men jeg har bodd i Islamske land (Oman, UAE osv.)som er gjennomsyret av den muslimske «moral» og «æreskodeks». Det mange muslimer får seg til å gjøre i Islams navn er rett og slett sykt. Jeg har et spørsmål til deg som jeg gjerne vil ha svar på. Hvorfor kom du til vesten og Norge, og hva forventet du deg? Du/dere kommer aldri til å bli Norske selv om du/dere er født i dette landet. Norge er for hvite etnisk Norske. Du og din familie kommer jo fra et eller annet sted hvor dere hører hjemme. Reis tilbake dit så slipper vi all den dritten dette «fargerike fellesskapet» fører med seg.
«Feilen» med islam er ikke bare at den ikke passer inn i den VESTLIGE verden, den passer overhode ikke inn NOE sted!!! Den passer ikke inn noe sted der det er MENNESKER! Mennesker ønsker frihet, velstand, trygghet og kjærlighet, men dette kan de ALDRI oppnå under islam!
Og muslimer som etterlyser Koran-sitater som «bevis» på at ideologien/religionen/»profeten» forkynner djevelskap, er direkte patetiske! De kan jo starte med SELV å lese Koranen, SELV å lese hadithene! Hvorfor trenger de oss «vantro» til å lære dem hva som står i deres egne såkalt «hellige» skrifter?
I will now quote the American Psychiatrist Wafa Sultan: «I came to the absolute conviction that it is impossible -- impossible! -- for any human being to read the biography of Muhammed and believe in it. And yet emerge a psychologically and mentally healthy person! The prophet muhammed had sex with a little 9-year girl: aisha. He waged many wars, owned slaves, raided caravans and ordered the killing of 900 unarmed jews in one single day in ancient saudi arabia. No true prophet of god could do such horrible acts. Muhammed was no Prophet of God. Leave islam. Become something else.»
Like I have said since I read the Quran; This Mohammad was never a «prophet»! May be he wanted to be -- at least he got really pissed when no one would recognize him as a «prophet»… -- may be he actually thought he was one, or may be he just used the words and phrases from the established religions in the area in his attempt to gain power (and get revenge to those who had rejected to recognize him as a «prophet»!). OR may be he really WAS a «prophet» after all! But if so, he was the prophet of SATAN! And islam is the devil’s own religion!
Remember that, every time you call that man a «prophet»!
Prophets aren’t terrorists. When they are rejected, they don’t slaughter, rob, or enslave. Muhammad did, which is why he was a prirate, not a prophet.
«‘We have endured a great deal from him.’ While they were saying this, the Apostle walked up and kissed the Black Stone. Then he performed the circumambulation of the Ka’aba. As he did they said some injurious things about him. I could see from the Messenger’s face that he had heard them. When he passed a second time they made similar remarks. When he passed them the third time, the Prophet stopped and said, ‘Hear me, O Quraysh. By Him who holds Muhammad’s life in his hand, I will bring you slaughter.’» The founder of Islam was performing pagan rites, kissing a rock idol and venerating a rock shrine. He had attacked the traditional values of his people, demeaned their ancestors, and caused division. He had built his «religion» of submission upon doctrines he had stolen from Qusayy, Hanif poetry, and Jewish scripture. And for what? So he could lay claim to Allah’s Fountain of Kausar -- the Ka’aba Inc. After enduring years of hate speech from Muhammad, the Meccans criticized him. They accurately labeled the prophet’s religion «plagiarized madness and sorcery.» In response, the founder of Islam turned to his accusers and said, «I will bring you slaughter.» Not salvation, not good news, not a wonderful message from a loving God. No. «I will bring you slaughter.» It was Muhammad’s message to the world. And he performed as promised.
Allah is a perfect match for the spirit Yahweh’s Scriptures call Satan.
Salmand Rushde wrote a story about an actual episode in Muhammad’s life: the Satanic Verses. The story of how and why Muhammad spoke for Satan is recorded in your scriptures. Rushde didn’t make it up. He didn’t mislead – Muhammad did.
Muhammad need to connect the Ka’aba to Abraham so he could rationalize Islam’s reliance on the Hebrew Bible. With the Bible snagged, he had himself a religion. Tabari I:293 “That jewel was lifted up until Allah sent Abraham to (re)build the House. This is meant by Allah’s word, ‘And We established for Abraham the place of the House as residence.’” [Qur'an 22:26] Muhammad was as predictable as sunrise.
So that I don’t leave you in the same quandary Muhammad left his stooge, the answer is simple. Satan is everywhere in Islam. He’s in the Qur’an, in the prophet, in the bodies of believers, in their homes, in Muhammad’s harem, and in his booty. Lucifer is a liar, so each time the Qur’an says: verily, truthfully, truly, surely, the right path, or the true religion, rest assured, he’s lying. There is a reason the Sunnah says: Tabari VI:107 “Satan Cast a False Qur’an Revelation on the Messenger of Allah’s Tongue.” And it’s the same reason Qur’an 22:52 claims: “Every Messenger or Prophet before you recited the message Satan cast into his recitation.”
The founders of Islam said: Ishaq:166 “Then Allah annulled what Satan had cast, and established his verses by telling him that he was like other prophets and messengers.’” Muhammad’s lord revealed: “Every Messenger or Prophet before you recited the message Satan cast into his recitation. Allah abrogates what Satan casts. Then Allah established his verses. Allah is Knower, Wise.” [Qur'an 22:52]
One lie has been refuted with another. The 22nd surah would not be revealed for another decade. In fact, it was one of the final Medina surahs. But by reciting it, Muhammad destroyed his only alibi – denial. Now that the Qur’an has verified the Satanic Verses, Muslims cannot whisk them under the carpet without impugning Allah’s credibility along with Muhammad’s.
Let’s take a quick look at the surah to better understand Muhammad’s mindset. But so as not to compound the prophet’s error and take the passage out of context, I want you to know that the 47th verse of this late surah speaks of Allah’s intended punishment on the Day of Doom. The 48th is about Allah overtaking townships, the 49th speaks of warnings, the 50th forgiveness, and the 51st demeans the inmates of the flaming fire. Somehow that brings us to: Qur’an 22:52 “Never did We send a messenger or a prophet before you, but, when he framed a desire, Satan threw some vanity into his desire: but Allah will cancel anything (vain) that Satan throws in,” A second translation reads: “He recited (the message) Satan proposed. But Allah abolishes that which Satan proposes.” Another claims: “Satan made a suggestion respecting his desire; but Allah annuls that which Satan casts,” And we have: “whose recitations Satan tampered with, yet Allah abrogates what Satan interpolates; and Allah will confirm His Signs/Revelations: for Allah is all-knowing and wise.”
It was such a devilishly delicate matter, so everyone seemed to have a little different take on what Allah allegedly revealed, albeit ten years late. But no matter how you slice it, the Qur’anic excuse confirms that the Satanic Verse episode actually occurred. The Hadith cannot, therefore, be “unauthorized.” Muhammad is said to have allowed Satan to throw “some vanity into his desires,” (The Quraysh Bargain) and to have allowed Satan to “tamper with the recitations” (The Satanic Verses). Allah then canceled Satan’s toss, abolished the Devil’s proposal, annulled Satan’s cast, or performed an abrogation – the ultimate miracle of the Qur’an. He never denied the Quraysh Bargain or the Satanic Verses. Therefore, Muslims can’t either.
Allah abrogating the Devil aside, the Qur’anic justification for the Satanic Verses ends with this treasure of spiritual inspiration: Qur’an 22:53 “That He may make the suggestions thrown in by Satan, the Devil’s proposals, but a trial and temptation for those in whose hearts is a disease. Verily the wrong-doers are in a schism. And those on whom knowledge has been bestowed may learn that the (Qur’an) is the truth from your Lord, and that they may believe therein, and their hearts may submit lowly before it, for verily Allah is the Guide of those who believe, to the Straight Way.” Muhammad succumbs to temptation, sides with the Devil, and it’s everyone’s fault but his own. His indulgence was convoluted into a trial for the infidels – our schism. Then, after saying that Satan’s proposals often slip into scripture, we are asked to trust the Qur’an, to submit lowly before it. While this is revolting, it is also convicting. Muslims who try to deny the existence of the Satanic Verses must deny the Qur’an, for it clearly acknowledges them.
That leaves Islam in an impossible position. Muslims must either admit that Muhammad was a power-hungry, money-grubbing, sex-crazed charlatan in cahoots with the Devil, or they must deny the validity of the Hadith and Qur’an. One leaves them without a prophet, the other without a god. Either way, they no longer have a religion.
Tabari VI:110 “Thus Allah removed the sorrow from his Messenger, reassured him about that which he had feared, and cancelled the words which Satan had cast on his tongue, that their gods were exalted high-flying cranes (goddesses) whose intercession was accepted with approval. He now revealed, following the mention of ‘Al-Lat, Al-Uzza, and Manat.’ the words: ‘are yours the males and his the females? That indeed is an unfair division! They are but names which you and your fathers have given.’ to the words: ‘to whom he wills and accepts.” [Qur'an 53:21]
Not only does this mean that Allah copy-edits Satan, it proves Muhammad didn’t know where he was – or even who said what to whom, when. The aforementioned quote was from the 53rd surah, which came before the 22nd. In fact, the 53rd was the forty-sixth surah handed down. It preceded the Satanic event by many years. The 22nd surah was 107th out of 114 in order of revelation. The Hadith says that these spiritual revelations followed one another, yet that is impossible. Not only is their order reversed, they are separated by a sea of words, hundreds of miles, and a decade of time.
So Islam has a fatal problem. If the rationale for dismissing the Satanic Verse/Quraysh Bargain episode isn’t valid, or even plausible, Muhammad’s motivations for establishing the submission religion were about vain desires, not godly revelations. There is no way for Muslims to differentiate between spiritual guidance and satanic deception – an acute problem considering how much of the Qur’an is fixated on Satan’s realm, pain, and punishment. Whether the Quraysh Bargain and Satanic Verses occurred or not, the Qur’an cannot be trusted, for it claims they did. Further, a “perfect and eternal tablet” cannot be out of order, inverted, or grossly disjointed – especially on an issue of this magnitude.
The entire validity of Islam pivots around the Satanic Verse/Quraysh Bargain. If Muhammad was enticed by sex, money, and power and capitulated, as these Hadiths testify, Islam is finished. The credibility of its lone prophet is tarnished beyond redemption. His motivations are exposed for all to see. As a result, Qusayy becomes the founder of Islam; Muhammad is simply a self-serving promoter. And Khadija’s Profitable Prophet Plan suddenly becomes the only viable explanation.
More devastating still, these events do not stand alone. Muhammad admitted that Islam was designed to enrich himself at the expense of others. We have examined his confessions. And his behavior from this point on, as chronicled by the Hadith, becomes entirely focused on sex, power, and money. As for Satan, Muhammad admitted being demon possessed. According to the Qur’an, his neighbors recognized the signs. They even offered to help him exorcise his demons.
The fact that Muhammad admitted to having been inspired by Satan has caused many to say that Islam is Satanic, and not without just cause; the evidence is overwhelming. The symbols used throughout the Islamic scriptures are from the Occult. A snake, the personification of Satan, led Abraham to the Ka’aba and revealed its foundations. A snake is the only creature said to have lived in the Ka’aba. The darkened or crescent moon, another Satanic symbol representing counterfeit light, is the religion’s logo. Allah was a moon god. He swore by the moon. His stone was black. The darkness of night was the best time to worship him and recite his message. The Qur’an was endorsed by jinn, demons from Satan’s tribe. Muhammad listened to soothsayers. He believed in magic spells. An occultist saved his father’s life; another wanted to lay with him. Even the seal of prophethood on Muhammad’s back was said to look like an apple – the image of Satanic temptation. And Satan played a starring role in the Qur’an, being named ten times more often than Muhammad.
Then there’s the Qur’an’s depiction of Allah. He spends time in Satan’s realm, tormenting the inmates of hell. He is never shown playing with the virgins in paradise. Allah, like Satan, is sadistic. He leads men astray, shackles them, and drags them into hell, where he’s personally involved, using their bodies as fagots for his fires. He turns men on a spit, makes them eat thorns, and pours boiling water on them for what he calls “their entertainment.”
Some will protest that the same book and prophet call Allah merciful, and that they claim Satan to be their foe. But that is the greatest proof of all. Satan never identifies himself; he is the master of camouflage. The Qur’anic orders to “crucify unbelievers” and “wipe infidels out to the last,” followed by “Allah is merciful and kind,” is perfectly transparent. It’s exactly what the Devil would do – appear divine while inspiring devilish behavior. In fact, the behavior in Allah’s heaven would lead men to the Biblical hell. Satan is the master of deceit. Black is white, the lie becomes true, and everything leads away from a relationship with the one true God.
There are but three differences between Satan and Allah. And those differences cause me to believe that Islam wasn’t wholly Satanic. Satan is real. He is powerful and brilliant. Allah was imagined. He was impotent and foolish. Much of Islam was Muhammad’s doing. He is to be despised, not pitied. He, like the demonic spirit that inspired him, must be exposed and rebuked.
Ishaq:212 “The Quraysh persecuted his followers, seducing some from their religion and exiling others. They became insolent towards Muhammad’s God and rejected His gracious purpose. They accused His prophet of lying. So He gave permission to His Apostle to fight those who had wronged him. He said in his Qur’an: ‘Fight them so that there will be no more seduction [i.e., no more exposing Islam's faults], until no Muslim is seduced from Islam. Fight them until the only religion is Islam and Allah alone is worshiped.’” [Qur'an 22:40 & 2:198] That’s reasonably clear: worship Allah or Muslims will kill you.
@ Vidar
I posted this to a Muslim once, he was so stupid that he claimed quote: » Salman Rushdie (The Blasphemer ) so famously (blasphemers like blasphemers) wrote about in his book “The Satanic Verses”(No one here can quote any Satanic verses from Holy Qur’aan, becuse there aren’t any)»
We heard no more from this Muslim after this.. LOL
Former Muslim, Wafa Sultan, says, “Islam is NOT a religion” Wafa Sultan invited scorn and death threats from Muslims around the world when she appeared on Al-Jazeera as the first Arab Muslim woman who dared to challenge Islam, the Prophet Muhammad, the Qur’an, and Allah. At great risk to her life and her family, Sultan travels around the country trying to explain to Americans that Islam is not a religion but rather a political ideology that is using religion as a front. She also explains why there is no ‘radical’ Islam, only Islam.