«Det er delte meninger om vi skal stå i Afghanistan. Selv mener jeg at landet og folket ikke er verdt livet til en eneste norsk soldat. Likevel bør vi bli der. Trekker vi oss ut med halen mellom beina vil de fanatiske morderbandene få blod på tann. Vi bør i stedet forsterke innsatsen, og ikke pålegge våre soldater meningsløse restriksjoner på krigføringen. I vestlige medier skrikes det opp om sivile offer, uten å bry seg med at fienden konsekvent opptrer i sivil, blander seg med befolkningen, og benytter kvinner og barn som levende skjold under kampene,» mener vår skribent. den norske krigsveteranen Bjarne Dahl, og han fortsetter:
«Det kan nevnes til ettertanke at 20.000 franske sivile, allierte borgere, ble drept av britiske og amerikanske bomber og granater under kampene i Normandie, og 15.000 samme sted i det halve året som gikk forut for invasjonen i 1944. I alt ble over 70.000 sivile franske menn, kvinner og barn drept av sine allierte, til tross for at frontene var klare, fienden uniformert, og stort sett fulgte krigens lover. Tallene for Italia er sammenlignbare. Det lar seg ikke gjøre å føre krig uten sivile tap. Våre motstandere vet det, og de tenker ”jo flere desto bedre”, fordi de vet at moralen er vår akilleshæl, at våre medier og politiske ledere ikke har ”guts” til å kjempe krigen til ende når de blir konfrontert med konsekvensene.
Muslimenes fanatisme og hat i hundrer av år er upåvirket av vestlig sivilisasjon og kristen humanisme. Vi må stå fast om vi skal overleve. Her er allerede for mange svakhetstegn, løslatelsen av massemorderen fra Lockerbie, til heltemottagelse i Libya, og Obamas knefall for moskébygging på tomten etter World Trade Center er dystre trekk i tiden. Det er på tide at Europa og USA beskikker sitt hus, og sender samtlige infiltrerte muslimer tilbake til sine hjemland. Det er trolig sant at ikke alle muslimer er terrorister, men på den annen side er så godt som alle terrorister muslimer, overalt på kloden, og omfanget er allerede så stort, og alvoret så skremmende, at det er rett å betrakte dem alle som potensielle terrorister. De kan alle, hver og én, slå til på ordre fra en langskjegget mullah i et fjernt utland, eller en heimeavlet utgave, eller rett og slett etter inspirasjon fra sine angivelig hellige skrifter. Vi har allerede opplevd så mye djevelskap fra muslimske innvandrere at vi vet hva vi har i vente etter hvert som de får forsterkninger. Vi har ikke lov til å spille hasard med landets fremtid, med våre barns og barnebarns liv og frihet. Ingen fremmede har rett til opphold i vårt land. Send dem ut, og ”lat folket som brødre saman bu.”
VG: Taliban ville drepe britisk statsminister
VG: Politifolk drept i Nord Afghanistan
Må si meg uenig for en gang skyld. Jeg sammenlikner vår tilstedeværelse i Afghanistan med USA´s tilstedeværelse i Vietnam. Hva i guds navn og rike har vi der å gjøre?
Et fremmed land som antakelig halve den norske befolkningen vil ha problemer med å plassere på kartet. Vi er den brikken i et politisk maktspill der USA er arkitekten. Legitimerer det vår tilstedeværelse i Afghanistan?
Nei, det gjør det virkelig ikke. Målet er å bekjempe terrorisme.
Eksperter hevder i dag at dette målet er en utopi. Det vil aldri bli reellt.
Vår tilstedeværelse i Afghanistan har derimot satt Norge på menykartet til terroristene. Vi har med andre ord SVEKKET sikkerheten. Ikke redusert den. At dette er så vanskelig å forstå synes jeg er merkelig. Hadde vi ved et militært angrep kunne slått ut en terrorist-trusel, hadde det kanskje vært legitimt. Men det kan vi ikke. Og vi vil aldri oppnå en slik «seier».
Få folket hjem for det begynner å eksplodere selvmordsbomber på Karl Johan.
Why should we continue to piss on this inferno, when it does not work? How do we extinguish an inferno?
The truth is that they will come after us, no matter what, as long as Islam is allowed to exist.
Just look at history and see what’s in their books:
Qur’an:8:39 «So fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief [non-Muslims]) and all submit to the religion of Allah alone (in the whole world).»
Qur’an:4:104 «And do not relent in pursuing the enemy.»
Bukhari:V4B52N220 «Allah’s Apostle said, ‘I have been made victorious with terror.’»
Ishaq:326 «If you come upon them, deal so forcibly as to terrify those who would follow, that they may be warned. Make a severe example of them by terrorizing Allah’s enemies.»
Qur’an:8:67 «It is not fitting for any prophet to have prisoners until he has made a great slaughter in the land.»
Ishaq:588 «When the Apostle descends on your land none of your people will be left when he leaves.»
Qur’an:8:67 «It is not fitting for any prophet to have prisoners until he has made a great slaughter in the land.»
Ishaq:208 «When Allah gave permission to his Apostle to fight, the second Aqaba contained conditions involving war which were not in the first act of submission. Now we bound themselves to war against all mankind for Allah and His Apostle. He promised us a reward in Paradise for faithful service. We pledged ourselves to war in complete obedience to Muhammad no matter how evil the circumstances.»
Ishaq:472 «Muhammad’s Companions are the best in war.»
Qur’an:8:7 «Allah wished to confirm the truth by His words: ‘Wipe the infidels out to the last.’»
Qur’an:8:12 «Your Lord inspired the angels with the message: ‘I am with you. Give firmness to the Believers. I will terrorize the unbelievers. Therefore smite them on their necks and every joint and incapacitate them. Strike off their heads and cut off each of their fingers and toes.’»
Qur’an:8:15 «Believers, when you meet unbelieving infidels in battle while you are marching for war, never turn your backs to them. If any turns his back on such a day, unless it be in a stratagem of war, a maneuver to rally his side, he draws on himself the wrath of Allah, and his abode is Hell, an evil refuge!»
Qur’an:8:39 «So, fight them till all opposition ends and the only religion is Islam.»
Qur’an:2:216 «Jihad (holy fighting in Allah’s Cause) is ordained for you (Muslims), though you dislike it. But it is possible that you dislike a thing which is good for you, and like a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knows, and you know not.» [Another translation reads:] «Warfare is ordained for you.»
Qur’an:4:95 «Not equal are those believers who sit at home and receive no injurious hurt, and those who strive hard, fighting Jihad in Allah’s Cause with their wealth and lives. Allah has granted a rank higher to those who strive hard, fighting Jihad with their wealth and bodies to those who sit (at home). Unto each has Allah promised good, but He prefers Jihadists who strive hard and fight above those who sit home. He has distinguished his fighters with a huge reward.»
Qur’an:47:4 «But if it had been Allah’s will, He Himself could have exacted retribution and punished them (without your help). But He lets you fight in order to test you. But those who are killed in Allah’s Cause, will never let their deeds go to waste.»
Qur’an:8:72 «Those who accepted Islam and left their homes to fight in Allah’s Cause with their possessions and persons, and those who gave them shelter and aided them are your allies. You are only called to protect Muslims who fight.»
Qur’an:8:73 «The infidels aid one another. Unless you do the same there will be anarchy in the land. Those who accepted Islam and left their homes to fight in Allah’s Cause are good Muslims.»
Ishaq:451 «Among us was Allah’s Apostle whose command we obey. When he gives an order we do not examine it. The spirit descends on him from his Lord. We tell him about our wishes and our desires which is to obey him in all that he wants. Cast off fear of death and desire it. Be the one who barters his life. Take your swords and trust Allah. With a compact force holding lances and spears we plunged into a sea of men…. and all were made to get their fill of evil. We are men who see no blame in him who kills.»
Ishaq:414 «If you kill us, the true religion is ours. And to be killed for the truth is to find favor with Allah. If you think that we are fools, know that the opinion of those who oppose Islam is misleading. We are men of war who get the utmost from it. We inflict painful punishment on those who oppose us…. If you insult Allah’s Apostle, Allah will slay you. You are a cursed, rude fellow! You utter filth, and then throw it at the clean-robed, godly, and faithful One.»
Can we Establish Democracy?
The first, last, and only democracy in human history was an oligarchy called the Delian League, which in less than 50 years disintegrated because its leaders became imperialists and elected to do what we are doing -- compel compliance. So when politicians claim to be establishing a democracy in Iraq, they are displaying their ignorance of democracy and the cultures in which it flourishes and shrivels.
For democracy to prevail, even a republic to succeed, the voters need to be enlightened and responsible. And they need to cherish the virtues which nurture education, freedom, and choice.
So let’s survey the political landscape. Over 90% of nations in which the majority of the people consider themselves Christians are republics. Relative freedom, choice, enlightenment, and prosperity reign. Over 90% of nations in which the majority of the people are Muslims are dictatorships in which the people have relatively no freedoms, choice, access to truth, or prosperity.
So what is it that causes one culture to embrace freedom, choice, enlightenment, and prosperity and the other to be hostile to these things? The answers are as obvious as the evidence is clear. The Judeo-Christian Scriptures are based upon knowing and understanding truth and embracing it while condemning deception. Yahweh wants people to be free to choose. The Islamic scriptures are the opposite. The fifth surah says that Muslims who question the Qur’an will lose their faith and become apostates. The fourth surah tells good Muslims to murder apostates. There is a significant disincentive to learn and question, to be enlightened. More importantly, Islam revolves around the concept of «submit and obey.» The Qur’an is completely hostile to freedom and choice.
For freedom and choice to prevail, the culture/religion/politics of the people must promote them. Islam does not. It never has and it never will. The evidence is overwhelming and undeniable. To ignore the obvious does not make us enlightened or compassionate. But it will make us dead.
Following World War II we was able to promote freedom, choice, enlightenment, and prosperity in Germany and Japan because we had correctly identified and defeated the politicians and doctrines responsible for tyranny and terror. We banned them before we attempted to establish what they strove against. Yet in Iraq, we have partnered with, financed, and promoted our real enemy, and the enemy of freedom, choice, enlightenment, and prosperity. As a result we will fail.
And the same can be said about Afghanistan and the Middle East.
IRAQ WAR: Mission Accomplished?
jeg støtter ikke krigen som føres av usa og norge. afg har aldri truet verden,og ialfall aldri norge.
vi alle veit denne krigen kan ikke bekjempes med våpen,kun dialog. var usa som startet denne krigen. så la de idiotene bli drept . så ingen støtte til norske soldatene !
pell dere hjem og skaff dere en normal jobb,dere alle er mordere!!
For en stor dust du framstår!
Her støtter jeg TOBY 100%! Afghanistan er ei hengemyr, og det lureste vi gjør er å komme oss vekk derfra jo før jo heller. Skal en få skikk på det landet så må Islam først forsvinne. Men Afghanistan er 100% muslimsk, og det er dødsstarff for å omvenne muslimer til kristendommen der. Og det burde være stor nok grunn til å komme seg derfra. Vesten kan ALDRI skape demokrati i et slikt sykt land som Afghanistan hvor de forskjellige klanene sitter med makta og styringen av landet. Kharzai er bare en puppet for USA, og han vil måtte forlate landet samme dagen som USA og NATO trekker seg ut, Ellers vil også han bli hengt i første lyktestolpe 1/2 time etter at amerikanerne har forlatt Kabul.
Den eneste grunnen til at USA og NATO er i Afghanistan er fordi dette landet er storeksportør av heroin, kokain, og dette vil de ha kontrollen og fortjenesten av. Noen annen grunnen til å være der ser ikke jeg. Og hvorfor i h….. skal norske soldater ofre livet sitt for muslimer?
The only way for us to win the war in Afghanistan would be to kill every Muslim in the Middle East. Since that isn’t going to happen, and shouldn’t happen, bring the troops home before more die making a bad situation worse. Let them live in “peace” (Submission) in their own countries, close the oil wells, borders and Islam will ruin themselves.
Vi bør sørge for å få hentet hjem våre soldater snarest mulig. De kjemper en håpløs og planlagt krig. En sannhet med islam er at den ikke ønsker demokrati. En annen sannhet er og at folk i Afghanistan ikke ønsker våre soldater der.
En annen og langt viktigere kamp for Norge og våre liv er å stanset innvandringen fra disse landene, om det så betyr å gjøre opprør mot våre egne og europeiske politikere!
En annen viktig sak er å få stanset globaliseringen av verden. Vi må få forkastet EØS avtalen snarest før den raner landet vårt. Globaliseringen og de som står bak den er årsaken til de problemer vi opplever, og her er faktisk både vestlige og muslimske land ofre!
Angående angrepet mot World Trade Center så kan jeg vise et nyhetsopptak hvor BBC varsler at WTC-7 bygningen har falt sammen. (Men oops. De var vist litt for tidlig ute!1)
Jeg vil gå så langt nå som å si at bare ignorante idioter tror fortsatt at 11/9 ble utført av muslimske terrorister! Hele krigen mot terror er en gedigen iscenesatt bløff!
At islam er blitt radikalisert skyldes at radikale grupper som Taliban, Al-Quaida med flere blir stimulert mot sin egen befolkning. Selv Norge betalte store bidrag til koranskoler i Pakistan for en del år tilbake. Vestlige land med USA i spissen sendte store mengder våpen til Muja-Hedin, forløperen til Taliban i Afghanistan da Sovjet var i landet. Og vær trygg på at det ikke er arabiske våpen Taliban benytter i dag!
Nå opplever vi at samme radikaliserte befolkning neddopet på en helt annen islam enn den som var i disse landene for 30-40 år siden, blir mottatt med åpne armer i en storstilt innvandring til våre land.
Angående byggingen av en moske på Ground-Zero. Jeg må bare le hvis noen påstår at Obama og Michael Bloomberg er blitt presset av muslimske terrorister til å gå med på byggingen av denne moskeen. Nei det er nok helt andre krefter som står bak. Noen med en helt annen intelligens og makt, enn noen forvillede ørkenvandrere med hodet neddopet med islam.
Nei ta dere en kopp med ekstra sterk kaffi så dere våkner av ignoransen, og begynner å undersøke hva som faktisk skjer i verden idag!
jse
Det var da voldsomt til kortsiktighet blant enkelte her (vet ikke om det er verdt å ta fyren som siterer på engelsk seriøst).
For å rette opp i den mest almenne misforståelsen her:
NATO-styrkene er ikke i Afghanistan fordi selve landet er en stor trussel mot Vesten. NATO er der for å frhindre at landet gjøres om til en massiv treningsleir for Al-Qaida. De mer geografikyndige av dere vet kanskje at Afghanistan grenser til Pakistan, og at Pakistan har vært på randen av borgerkrig i flere år. Hvis Al-Qaida får organisert seg i Afghanistan kommer de til å strømme over grensa og inn i selve Pakistan, og da tar det ikke lang tid før regjeringen veltes og Pakistans atomvåpen er i hendene på Osama Bin Laden (som antageligvis kommer til å bruke dem mot India samtidig som Iran prøver å smugle atomvåpen til Hamas og Hizbollah).
Er det dette dere ønsker?
Anonym 00:19, jeg tror NATO har en annen agenda enn den du nevner. Selv om det høres vanvittig ut, så er en av grunnene, som det er nevnt tidligere her, at de vil ha kontroll med narkotikaproduksjonen i verden. Der er et spill bak de lukkede dører som ingen av oss forstår. Å «bekjempe terrorisme» havner nok langt ned på lista over grunner til at Norge har fått sitt Vietnam. Det er den «berømte» makteliten som avgjør hvilke kriger som skal startes og hvilke land som skal ruineres økonomisk. Det er dette som er så forbanna vanskelig for mannen i gata å fatte. Verden er ikke slik den ser ut og slik vi daglig blir fortalt av media. Verden er en konspirasjon mot menneskeheten. Vi vanlige lever i et mørke der vi bare aner hva som foregår. Vi sluker rått det som blir servert i media. Men media er ingen tilfeldig informasjonskilde til kveget. Det er nøye planlagt hva vi skal få vite. Slik at sånne som deg, fortsatt kan leve tilfreds i det uvisse.
Al-Qaeda, meaning «the Base» in English, is a Salafi Muslim organization. As fundamentalists, they are guided exclusively by the oldest Islamic sources. These include: Allah’s Qur’an or Recital whose oldest written fragments date to 725 CE, Muhammad’s Sira or Biography compiled by Ishaq in 750 CE (120 years after Muhammad’s death), Islam’s Ta’rikh or History compiled by Tabari between 870 and 920 CE, and the Hadith or Oral Reports from Muhammad and his Companions compiled by Bukhari and Muslim around 850 CE. As Salafi Muslims, al-Qaeda members strive to obey Allah’s orders and follow Muhammad’s example. And that is why they are terrorists.
While al-Qaeda is often referred to as Wahhabist, that designation just means that they adhere to the pure, uncorrupted form of Islam lived and taught by Allah’s lone messenger and Islam’s solitary prophet Muhammad. And that’s not good since according to the oldest Islamic sources Allah’s prophet was a sexual pervert, a rapist and pedophile, a womanizer and adulterer who was incestuous. Muhammad was actively engaged in armed robbery, mass murder, kidnapping, extortion, and the slave trade. But more than anything, Muhammad was a terrorist. Allah’s messenger led 75 terrorist raids during the first ten years of the Islamic Era.
While al-Qaeda is led by Allah, it was founded by Dr. Muhammad Abdullah Azzam. Today, the Islamic club’s ambassadors are Osama bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri. I will detail their lives in a moment. But first, let’s review how al-Qaeda came to exist.
The inspiration and guidance was provided by Palestinian Islamic cleric and scholar Abdallah Azzam. Dr. Abu Muhammad Abdallah Azzam was the charismatic figure who served as bin Laden’s ideologue and spiritual mentor. The Islamic academician named «Slave-to-Allah» taught that Jihad was the personal responsibility of every Muslim to liberate the lands of Islam from infidel control. His mantra was consistent with the definition of Jihad found in the Noble Qur’an’s first use of the term:
«Jihad is holy fighting in Allah’s Cause with full force of numbers and weaponry. It is given the utmost importance in Islam and is one of its pillars. By Jihad, Islam is established, Allah’s Word is made superior, which means only Allah has the right to be worshiped, and Islam is propagated. By abandoning Jihad, Islam is destroyed and Muslims fall into an inferior position. Their honor is lost, their lands are stolen, their rule and authority vanish. Jihad is an obligatory duty in Islam on every Muslim. He who tries to escape from this duty, dies with one of the qualities of a hypocrite.» (Noble Qur’an -- Translation of the Meanings in the English Language, definition reference to Qur’an 2:190, page 39, furnished by the King Fahd Complex for the Printing of the Holy Qur’an, translated by Dr. Muhammad al-Hilali and Dr. Muhammad Muhsin Khan of the Islamic University, Al Madinah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia).
You should know that the Qur’an defines «hypocrite» in the 9th surah as peace-loving, moderate Muslims who are so vile that Allah will personally attend to their tortures in hell. Therefore, being a peaceful Muslim is a lose-lose scenario. If Muhammad spoke for God and the Qur’an is accurate, Allah hates peaceful Muslims and will personally destroy them. If Muhammad was a lying buffoon, the real hypocrite, then relying upon his religion is a fool’s folly.
Osama bin Laden’s jihad mentor, and the actual founder of al-Qaeda, the Palestinian professor Dr. Muhammad Abdallah Azzam said: «The love of jihad (holy war) took over my life, my soul, my sensations, my heart and my emotions. If preparing for jihad is terrorism, then we are terrorists. If defending our honor is extremist, we are extremists. If jihad against our enemies is fundamentalism, we are fundamentalists.» (Dr. Abdallah Azzam as quoted on commemorative posters printed by HAMAS’ Tulkarm Charitable Society).
The professor’s words are repeated in books, pamphlets, audio and video cassettes, and they are preached in mosques. He is considered one of the four most outstanding figures of the Islamic struggle in Palestine and around the world. Also included on that list are Hassan al-Bana, who founded the Muslim Brotherhood (from which all modern Islamic terrorist organizations sprang), Sheikh Izzedine al-Qassam, a Syrian Islamic cleric and terrorist whose epic speeches and exploits are considered exemplary, and Ahmad Yassen, the founder of HAMAS.
Dr. Abdallah Azzam attended Islam’s foremost academic institution, Al-Azhar University in Cairo, Egypt. It was there that he became a student of Islam and joined the Muslim Brotherhood. He received a doctorate in Islamic Law, graduating with honors. With these credentials, you can be assured that Dr. Muhammad Abdallah Azzam’s understanding of Islam is consistent with the Islamic scriptures. Osama bin Laden’s jihad mentor and religious teacher knows Islam infinitely better than all of the politicians who errantly claim that his student «corrupted, misinterpreted, and hijacked a peaceful religion.».
Following his graduation, and shortly after the Six Day War, Azzam moved to Jordan. As part of the Muslim Brotherhood, he participated in terrorist raids against Israel in the Jordan Valley. He became a commander of a base in Zarqa, Jordan where Muslim Brotherhood militants were trained so that they could operate in Israel under the Palestinian Fatah flag.
During the 1970s, Azzam taught Islamic Law at the University of Jordan in Amman. But when he used his position to recruit for the Muslim Brotherhood he was fired. Along with other members of the Muslim Brotherhood, he left for Saudi Arabia in 1980.
In 1981 Azzam began teaching Islamic Theology at the King Saud bin Abdul al-Aziz University (named after Saud King Faisal, Muhammad bin Laden’s (Osama’s father) benefactor) in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Osama bin Laden, attended the same school but graduated two years before Dr. Azzam’s arrival. But what’s important here is that Dr. Muhammad Abdullah Azzam would not have been allowed to teach Islamic Theology at Saudi Arabia’s premier state-run university if his interpretation of Islam differed in any appreciable way from that of the Saud family or the Wahhabist clerics they employed.
Now while Saudi Arabia was on the front lines of propagating Salafi Islam, Pakistan was ground zero for implementing fundamentalist Islam. So Dr. Muhammad Abdallah Azzam, at the urging of the Muslim World League, volunteered to teach at the International Islamic University in Islamabad, Pakistan. This was two years after the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, so the Great Jihad was boiling.
For the next few years, between 1981 through 1984, Dr. Azzam remained on the Saudi payroll while teaching fundamentalist Islam in Pakistan’s political capital. But he didn’t get a good report card from the Pakistanis who wanted him preparing jihadists rather than being a jihadist. His Saud funding was temporarily suspended and Azzam left Islamabad for Peshawar, where he began teaching at the College for Preaching and Jihad. Simultaneously, he managed the Pakistani offices of the Muslim Brotherhood and was responsible for sending Muslim Brotherhood teachers into Pakistani public and religious schools to promote jihad.
Muhammad Abdallah Azzam first met his star pupil when he was lecturing at the College for Preaching and Jihad in Peshawar, Pakistan, a town near the Afghanistan border. The college educated/indoctrinated many mujahideen (holy warriors) who participated in the Great Jihad against the Soviet Army. For this, Azzam is adulated to this day in the Islamic world.
The Al-Azhar professor laid the foundation for al-Qaeda, the Taliban, HAMAS, as well as most Islamic terrorist organizations. He expounded upon fundamentalist Islam in his fatwah, or Islamic religious edict, entitled: The Defense of Muslim Lands -- the Most Important Personal Duty. It has become canonical in the Muslim world. Not only is it distributed by the Taliban and HAMAS, it has become required reading material for all al-Qaeda affiliated Islamic associations. First published in 1984, by the Modern Mission Library in Amman, Jordan, Dr. Abdullah Azzam’s book serves as al-Qaeda’s Constitution. His fatwah features quotations from the oldest Islamic sources, both Qur’an and Hadith, along with support from leading Muslim clerics in Saudi Arabia.
There is no question that bin Laden was influenced by Azzam’s rhetoric and charisma, or that the teacher and student immediately bonded. But this needs to be made clear: Dr. Muhammad Abdullah Azzam didn’t tell Osama bin Laden anything he didn’t already know. Azzam’s interpretations of Islam were identical to those preached in the Saudi mosques and taught in the Saudi schools bin Laden had attended. All Azzam did was distill the essential scriptural sources down so that the conclusion was undeniable and irrefutable -- Allah demands that all Muslims fight to the death in his cause. Jihad is compulsory in Islam. The religion is a declaration of war on all mankind.
The cooperation between Dr. Azzam and bin Laden was manifest in what they called «the four institutions and mosques.» These were established one after another. When they united, the grew into the infrastructure of al-Qaeda. They were:.
1) Bayt al-Ansar, or the House of the Supporters. As the first institution established by Azzam and bin Laden, BA served to provide infrastructure and logistical support, including food, shelter, clothing, and Islamic study material, for the mujahideen who had come to Pakistan to fight the Russians.
2) Maktab Khadamat, or the Office of Mujahideen Services. Its purpose was to equip the jihadists. It was financed by Saudi Intelligence, the Saudi Red Crescent, the Saud royal family, and by King Faisal himself.
3) While there was never a specified name for the project, the MAK ventured into the construction of training camps. In this endeavor, Abdallah Azzam and Osama bin Laden had two benefactors. The bases were provided courtesy of the Pakistani government by way of their intelligence community known as the ISI. Their weapons were provided by the American CIA -- who by this time had already been arming Islamic fundamentalists in Pakistan and Afghanistan for four years. (More on that later.).
4) Al-Qaeda al-Subah, or the Firm Base. The original name al-Qaeda al-Subah was chosen by Dr. Muhammad Abdallah Azzam, not bin Laden. It had nothing to do with the database Osama compiled of jihadists as is often reported. The name al-Qaeda al-Subah tells us that the organization was conceived to provide a firm Islamic foundation from which jihadists would succeed at being shaheeds -- meaning martyrs who witness to Islam and earn paradise by dying fighting Infidels in Allah’s Cause. The purpose of al-Qaeda al-Subah is to prepare Muslims for terrorist operations. That would include religious education, physical training, as well as logistical support for jihad.
Within this structure, Osama bin Laden toiled in the areas of acquiring funding, providing life support for arriving jihadists, building training camps, and allocating American weaponry. Dr. Azzam was engaged in recruiting, preaching Islam, and establishing the firm religious base the Islamic mujahideen would require to fight and die as a jihadist. While Abdullah Azzam and Osama bin Laden were partners in the development of Bayt al-Ansar, Maktab Khadamat, and Al-Qaeda al-Subah, they were not equals. The inspiration for al-Qaeda, its guiding light, was Azzam. The Palestinian professor was al-Qaeda’s founder, its spiritual leader, the man who wrote its business plan, and its inspiration. The Saudi student was the technician. In business parlance, Azzam was Founder, Chairman, and CEO while bin Laden was Chief Operating Officer and CFO.
Using Saudi, Pakistani, and American money, Dr. Azzam traveled around the globe, establishing the connections that would lead to al-Qaeda’s worldwide network of affiliates. He even visited the United States, participating in an Islamic conference in Oklahoma City in 1988 (the site of an al-Qaeda affiliate’s (Abu Sayyaf’s) initial strike in the United States). During that trip, he also visited mosques and Islamic schools in Brooklyn, New York, where he successfully recruited jihadists and aided and abetted al-Qaeda’s second and third strikes on U.S. soil. While in the United States, Azzam also met with the Islamic Association for Palestine, a cover for HAMAS, designed to transfer tax-exempt dollars from American Muslims to Islamic terrorism.
Dr. Azzam appears on a video cassette entitled «The Jihad in America» which recorded his visits to the United States in the late 1980s. It was produced by journalist Steve Emerson and was broadcast in America in 1994 -- seven years before Azzam’s ambitions were fulfilled in New York and Washington.
On November 24, 1989, Abdallah Azzam, al-Qaeda al-Subah’s founder and religious leader, was killed along with two of his sons when a bomb exploded in his car in Peshawar, Pakistan. His assassins were either Soviet intelligence agents or representatives of the pro-Soviet regime in control of Afghanistan at the time, or both.
Today, Dr. Muhammad Abdallah Azzam is known as «Amir Jihad,» or the «Leader of the Holy War.» After analyzing the fall of the Muslim world he came to the conclusion that the abandonment of jihad was responsible for Islam’s decline. He recognized that Islam had been built by the sword and it had died when the swords had been laid down.
Azzam exposed fundamentalist Islamic doctrine that came to permeate the rhetoric of the association he founded. He said that jihad was the vehicle Muslims must deploy to regain their power. He said that any land which had ever been subjected to Islamic rule at any time must be returned to Islamic dominion. He taught that Infidels should not be allowed to tread on Muslim soil. Azzam preached that indiscriminate terrorist attacks on civilian populations were legitimate Islamic practices that had to be deployed to achieve victory.
To verify the veracity of these fatwahs, the Islamic cleric and scholar quoted Islamic Hadith attributable to the prophet Muhammad. He noted that Muslims had a duty and were authorized to attack infidels even if the targets were women and children, and not fighters. His use of Hadith and Qur’an surahs in this regard became the foundation for Islamic terrorism as we know it today.
In his parting salvo, Dr. Azzam wrote an open letter to Muslims he entitled «The Will.» It was hauntingly similar to the Nazi recruiting film, Triumph of the Will.
«My fellow Muslims,.
Jihad is your life, jihad is your glory. The substance of your existence is linked by fate to jihad. Fellow preachers, you have no value on this earth beyond that of you destroying the population of cruel rulers, infidels and sinners [i.e., killing all non-Muslims and peaceful Muslims].
Those of the opinion that the religion of Allah can be victorious without a jihad, without a battle, and without dismembered bodies strewn in every direction only delude themselves. They do not understand the essence of the Islamic religion.
Indeed, veneration for religious Islamic preachers, the might of the message of Islam, and the eminence of Muslims will never be realized without a battle against the infidels. In the words of the prophet Muhammad: «Yea verily will Allah displace from the hearts of your enemies their fear of you, while in your hearts he will certainly plant faintheartedness.» And those who heard him asked: «Messenger of Allah, what is faintheartedness?» And the prophet answered: «The love of pleasures as opposed to the hatred of death and aversion to battle.» Take the initiative and lead those of this generation who have returned to their sovereign [Muslims who accept Allah as their sole leader], may your hearts know no fear and yearn not for mundane pleasures. Beware lest you rely upon the luxurious table of cruel rulers, for they will destroy your hearts and extinguish them, separate you from the generation and drive a wedge between your hearts and theirs.».
As we discovered earlier, the Maktab al-Khadamat, or MAK, was a joint venture with the Pakistani government by way of their Inter Services Intelligence (ISI), the United States Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), and Saudi Arabia with their OPEC funding and Wahhabi inspiration. Of this alliance from hell, the leader of the British House of Commons correctly wrote: «Bin Laden was a product of monumental miscalculation by western security agencies.» He was right. And since this «monumental miscalculation» has obliterated 7,000 American lives in the last ten years, you deserve to know who was responsible.
The policy to equip Islamic fundamentalists was crafted by Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) leader, Zbigniew Brzezinski. At the time he was President Jimmy Carter’s mentor and National Security Advisor. Years before the Soviets invaded Afghanistan, Zbigniew Brzezinski conceived, sold, and implemented the plan to lure them in, creating a Russian Vietnam by way of Islamic jihadists.
During this time the American CIA covertly funneled $250 million a year in cash and weaponry to Maktab al-Khadamat, al-Qaeda al-Sudah, and Taliban jihadists. The total to Osama bin Laden’s associates ultimately climbed to over a billion dollars. And overall U.S. military aid to Muslim militants in Afghanistan, including the Taliban, exceeded $5 billion. Not only was the Pakistani Taliban the most substantial recipient of CIA weaponry, their Foreign Affairs Minister, the man who was responsible for the Taliban’s dealings with the ISI and CIA was Hamid Karzai -- George Bush’s appointed leader of Afghanistan.
A little background here is in order because the facts are, America was instrumental in creating both the Taliban and al-Qaeda. At the time Zia was dictator over Pakistan. He worked with the U.S as early as July of 1979 to start arming Pakistani and Afghani Mujahideen to fight against the Soviet-backed government in Afghanistan. The Soviets, who liked the Marxist-Muslim government in Kabul, did not invade until late December -- six months later.
This fact was not known at the time and has only come to light recently as CFR, CIA, and NSA officials have jumped up to claim their credit for helping to tear down the Soviet Union. Robert Gates, a former director of the CIA, confessed as much in his memoirs entitled From the Shadows.
But even more revealing is an interview in the French Le Nouvel Observateur in 1998. It was conducted with former American National Security Adviser to Jimmy Carter, Zbigniew Brzezinski. He said: «According to the official version of history, CIA aid to the Mujahideen began during 1980, that is to say, after the Soviet Army invaded Afghanistan, on December 24th, 1979. But the reality, closely guarded until now, is completely otherwise. Indeed, it was July 3rd, 1979 that President Carter signed the first directive for secret aid to the opponents of the pro-Soviet regime in Kabul. And that very day, I wrote a note to the President in which I explained to him that in my opinion this aid was going to induce a Soviet military intervention.».
This is stunning, since the U.S. vilified the Soviet Union for being the aggressor in Afghanistan. Jimmy Carter scoffed at their «lies» when the Soviets claimed they were trying to fight against «the secret involvement of foreign influences [read: the United States] in Afghanistan.» It was so hypocritical. The holier-than-thou Jimmy Carter boycotted the 1980 Olympics in protest of the Soviet Union’s incursion, and set into motion an international anti-Soviet propaganda machine condemning them as aggressors and a threat to world peace, when he himself was the instigator -- the man who started a war that killed nearly 15,000 Russians, 7,000 Americans, 1.3 million Afghanis, and as many as 6 million additional people worldwide since that time.
When Council on Foreign Relation’s head and National Security Advisor, Zbigniew Brzezinski, was asked if he regretted pulling off such a massive and deadly deception against the world, he replied, «Regret what? That secret operation was an excellent idea. It had the effect of drawing the Russians into the Afghan trap and you want me to regret it? The day that the Soviets officially crossed the border, I wrote to President Carter, in substance: We now have the opportunity of giving to the USSR its Vietnam War. Indeed, for almost 10 years, Moscow had to carry on a war unsupportable by the government, a conflict that brought about the demoralization and finally the breakup of the Soviet empire.».
While this was a contributing factor to the demise of the USSR, America’s support of the Soviet Union in World War II under somewhat similar pretenses, established the beast in the first place. In other words, when a nation deploys the strategy of the enemy of my enemy is my friend, they manufacture their next foe -- and all too often they create a much bigger mess.
Brzezinski capped off his amazing confession with a callous disregard for the consequences of aiding and abetting Islamic fundamentalists. He asked: «What is most important to the history of the world? The Taliban or the collapse of the Soviet empire? Some stirred-up Muslims, or the liberation of Central Europe and the end of the Cold War?».
The interviewer, even in the pre-9/11 context of 1998, and being a member of the politically correct, Islam-tolerant French media, threw back, «Some stirred-up Moslems? It has been said and repeated: Islamic fundamentalism represents a world menace today.» Brzezinski, angered at his interviewer’s attempt to hold him accountable for his actions, responded, «Nonsense! It is said that the West had a global policy in regard to Islam. That is stupid. There isn’t a global Islam. Look at Islam in a rational manner and without demagoguery or emotion. It is the leading religion of the world with 1.5 billion followers. But what is there in common among Saudi Arabian fundamentalism, moderate Morocco, Pakistan militarism, Egyptian pro-Western, or Central Asian secularism? Nothing more than what unites the Christian countries.».
I’d like to see him tell that same story to the 1,000 American families who have lost loved ones to Islam in Israel, Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia, the Sudan, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Kuwait, the Philippines, Indonesia, India, Kenya, Tanzania, Libya, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, and Egypt. Or to the 3,000 American families who lost loved ones to Islam in New York City, Washington, D.C., and Pennsylvania on September 11th, 2001. Or to the 3,000 American families who have lost loved ones to Islam in the War of Terrorism since that time in Afghanistan and Iraq. The investment of $5 billion used to fund fundamentalist Muslims to fight the Soviets pales in comparison to the $550 billion the nation has had to spend undoing that damage in the past four years.
Brzezinski’s ignorance of Islam, and his errant comparison of it to Christianity in the West, set the stage for an onslaught of Islamic terrorism that has engulfed the world in fear, enslaved a billion lives with its oppression, and killed 6 million people in thirty-five years. The enemy that he funded is now on the path of nuclear annihilation with America being the prime target. The U.S. had once again manufactured a more lethal enemy than it eliminated. It matters not if the White House occupant is Republican or Democrat. They are all Satan’s little helpers and scheming scumbags.
The nature of al-Qaeda changed dramatically after Iraq invaded Kuwait in 1990. Osama bin Laden, who was like a son to the Saud family, negotiated for the right to defend the holy Islamic lands from the secular infidel Saddam Hussein. Fresh off of his victory over the Soviet Union, he promised tens of thousands of armed mujahideen, all amply equipped with American weapons. But he was rebuffed by the Saudi OPECers in favor of George H.W. Bush who had also applied for the job for personal reasons. A former ally, Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda, was now a foe.
It would turn out to be among the costliest victory’s in American history. As a direct result of being rebuked, Osama bin Laden renounced his government and condemned its dependency upon the United States. He demanded the closure of all American bases in Saudi Arabia and the complete withdrawal of the U.S. military -- a demand that America has now met. He then issued his most famous fatwah. Following in the footsteps of his prophet and his mentor, called for the Muslim world to rise up and kill Americans -- anywhere and everywhere.
Most American’s are ignorant of these astonishing facts. Had America not deployed its troops to liberate one OPECer from another during Operation Desert Storm, 9/11 would not have occurred. And second, after saving the fundamentalist Islamic Saudis from the secular Iraqis, and after invested another $5 billion in American military bases in Saudi Arabia, the United States cut and ran. Not only are there no longer any American bases or troops in the Saud fiefdom, the oil-drenched royalty would not allow America to use its soil for the reinvasion of Iraq following 9/11.
The flood of American troops into Saudi Arabia in 1991 revolted OBL and his Islamic associates to the point of rage. This led to Osama’s intense hatred of his former ally, America, and to the undermining of the Saud fiefdom in Arabia -- pushing them to be ever more repressive and Islamic to survive. Bin Laden then used America’s presence in Arabia, and the «crusaders» attack on Iraq, to inflame anti-American sentiment among Muslim militants worldwide.
Bin Laden’s criticisms of the Saud warlords that got him expelled to the Sudan where the rejected boy pouted and then plotted his revenge: 9/11. Funded by donations through Islamic charitable fronts such as Benevolence International and Khalid bin Mahfouz’s Muwaffaq Foundation, meaning «Blessed Relief,» Osama and his brother-in-law, Muhammad Jamal Khalifa, reestablished their mujahideen operations in the Sudan. Their farms, on land confiscated from native Africans, were used to disseminate Salafi-fundamentalist Islam, to train Muslim militants, and to recruit jihadists from mosques in the Philippines, Indonesia, Egypt, Jordan, Syria, Somalia, Yemen, Pakistan, Lebanon, the Palestinian territories, Saudi Arabia, Germany, England, and the United States.
So that we understand the environment in which he flourished, Arab Muslims in the Sudan, before, during, and after OBL’s tenure there, conducted the most horrific genocide since the Holocaust -- killing 2.7 million non-Muslim Africans in 20 years. Many of the murderers were corrupted on bin Laden’s farms in the Sudan, although to be fair, bin Laden was a late arrival to this party.
Osama bin Laden’s terrorist activities included training in the Qur’an and the use of explosives. He was supported by the Muslim warlord, Dr. Hassan ‘abdAllah al-Turabi -- the head of the National Islamic Front, and Sudanese dictator. As is true with most of the Islamic world, terror is state sponsored, the official business of Islam. Al-Turabi established Sharia law in the Sudan which made any religion other than Islam illegal. During this time, bin Laden and his Islamic pals began planning and executing a series of attacks. These include the murders of U.S. troops in Riyadh and Dahran, Saudi Arabia as well as in Kenya and Tanzania.
However, in the midst of the Sudanese holocaust, Osama bin Laden became a lightening rod, and a distraction. America was more interested in capturing him on behalf of the Sauds than the nation was protecting millions of Africans from continued slaughter at the hands of the Islamic government forces. Consequently, the Sudan expelled OBL to Afghanistan so that they could go on killing Africans without interruption.
Bin Laden’s first blood against U.S. citizens occurred on December 29, 1992. He planned the bombing of the Gold Mihor Hotel in Aden, Yemen. The Yemeni hotel had served as home for 100 American troops who were part of Operation Restore Hope in Somalia.
Jeg glemte selvsagt å fylle inn brukernavn når jeg skrev dette i går… så, la meg se om jeg forstår deg rett:
NATO, USA, Storbritannia og de andre aktørene i Afghanistan er der fordi de vil ha kontroll over narkotikaindustrien der (i så fall merkelig at de ikke har invadert Bolivia allerede). Dette er et skyggespill som de mektige verdenslederne driver med i all hemmelighet, og fører følgelig resten av verden bak lyset. Så da er mitt spørsål til deg: hvordan har det seg at du alene sitter med sannheten? Har du kontakter på innsiden kanskje?
Og mens du er i gang, har du flere artige avsløringer å komme med, f.eks. at jødene sto bak 9/11 eller lignende?
Jeg sitter ikke alene med sannheten heldigvis. Sannheten er skjult for folket men for de som vil, er der tusenvis av artikler på nettet om akkurat dette.
Her er en av de.
salon.com/news/fea…hanistan_as_drug_war
infowars.com/ameri…-war-in-afghanistan/